columnist_environment.jpg

Harmful Rays

Written by: Michael Jessen

(Article posted in: The Environment )

Even in the dog days of summer, sun on skin can be too much of a good thing.

Though the nights are getting longer and the angle of the sun is shading south, you should still be concerned about getting sun-sational – and limit your exposure to the Earth’s brightest star.

The warm feeling of sunshine on skin for a few minutes every day is a good thing. It helps the skin make Vitamin D that is essential for the assimilation of calcium and other minerals.

For that hour or two of serious beach tanning, well isn’t that what sunscreens are for?

Ah, there’s the rub. Not all sunscreens are created equal. In fact, according to the Environmental Working Group, some sunscreens do virtually nothing to prevent premature skin aging, skin cancer, and other skin problems.

EWG conducted an investigation of 832 name-brand sunscreens and found evidence that 84% of the products on the market are either unsafe or ineffective.

Their study concluded that one in every eight high-SPF sunscreens do not offer protection from UVA radiation, a form of ultraviolet sunlight that is just as harmful as the ultraviolet B (UVB) rays that most current sunscreens protect against.

It also identified 134 products that offer very good sun protection with ingredients that present minimal health risks to users.

SPF, or Sun Protection Factor, is a measurement of how well a sunscreen will protect skin from UVB rays, the kind of radiation that causes sunburn. If your skin would normally burn after 10 minutes in the sun, for example, wearing an SPF 15 sunscreen would theoretically allow you to stay in the sun for 150 minutes (10 x 15) without burning.

However, the SPF rating can be confusing and misleading at times since the scale is not linear. SPF 50 does not prevent burns two-thirds times longer than a SPF 30, and in fact blocks only about 1.3% more UVB radiation than the SPF 30.

More importantly, the SPF rating tells you nothing about the sunscreen’s ability to protect against the also harmful UVA radiation.
Now the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which in 1999 set the standards for formulating, testing and labelling of sunscreen products that protect against UVB rays, is proposing a new regulation for products offering UVA protection.

The FDA’s August 23rd announcement was labelled long overdue by the EWG.

“The proposed sunscreen safety regulations by the FDA are a positive step forward, but we’ve been here before and seen FDA cave in to industry objections,” said Jane Houlihan, vice-president for research at EWG.

“FDA first pledged to implement federal safety sunscreen regulations over 28 years ago and to date nothing has been finalized,” she added. “We hope this time FDA moves much faster so the public can have confidence in the claims that they see on sunscreen product labels.”

Under the proposed regulation, a scale of one to four stars will provide a rating system for UVA protection. One star will represent low UVA protection, two stars medium protection, three stars high protection, and four stars the highest available protection.

In addition, sunscreens that offer no UVA protection will have to be labelled such on the container near the SPF value.

The FDA is also proposing a warning statement be added to all sunscreen products. The warning will say: “UV exposure from the sun increases the risk of skin cancer, premature skin aging, and other skin damage. It is important to decrease UV exposure by limiting time in the sun, wearing protective clothing, and using a sunscreen.”

The warning is intended to increase awareness that sunscreens are only one part of a sun protection program.

Since the FDA is accepting public comment on the new rule until November 26, 2007, the EWG is urging everyone to tell the FDA to finalize and implement its proposed standards ASAP.

Your comment must be identified with Docket No. 1978N-0038 and can be submitted electronically at www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.

Think of it as a way of making your moments in the sun more healthy and safe.

Michael Jessen is a Nelson eco-writer and can be reached by phone at 250 229-5632.

Other Articles by this Author

Winterizing Your Home

Freezing cold days and nights have hit us with an icy blast. Are you shivering in your home? It may be ...[...Read More]

The Antarctica Challenge

It is Earth’s fifth largest continent, yet devoid of permanent human inhabitants. Bigger than the contiguous 48 United States and ...[...Read More]

The Low-Carbon Path

We yak a lot about the economy in Canada these days when what we really need is more conversations about ...[...Read More]

Living the Answers

Life is full of questions  ~ ‘what ifs’, ‘whys’ and ‘how comes.’ Why is life filled with transience, uncertainty, and suffering? ...[...Read More]

Building Better Homes

Almost all of us live and work in dumb buildings. Our homes and workplaces are over-lit and under-insulated; their structural, electrical, ...[...Read More]

A Dubious Reward

Our Conservative federal government has an uncanny ability to find the sin in doing good. Being responsible and undertaking right action ...[...Read More]

Our Stormy Weather

“There is no such thing as bad weather, only different kinds of good weather.” – John Ruskin Given that writer and critic ...[...Read More]

Offsetting a Carbon Flight

Having spent 37 of the past 39 winters in B.C.’s Southern Interior, there does come a time when I think ...[...Read More]

Shopping for a Better World

Shopping - it’s something we all do. And because of that, we shoppers are the most powerful people on the planet. ...[...Read More]

No Bailout for Carmakers

To bailout or not to bailout? It shouldn’t even be a question. Canada’s federal government is considering financial aid to the ...[...Read More]

Dream a Green Christmas

Love Christmas and love the planet. The annual holiday dedicated to a celebration of consumption doesn’t have to preclude showing ...[...Read More]

Whistling Past the Graveyard

To pollute or not to pollute, that is the question. Strange as it may seem, the answer does not lie ...[...Read More]
« Back to: The Environment